eq 215ix
Re: eq 215ix
Hmm, Might be an elegant solution for a set of comps with a substage since it has an lpl 44 connector ?ttocs wrote:yes
Re: eq 215ix
You might have a little more room to work with than I do though.ttocs wrote:I love mine.........
Re: eq 215ix
most of the cross-overs have lpl ability as well
what else can I say I am a grumpy asshole most of the time.
-
Lowcountrypsulion
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 3:38 am
- Location: Charleston, South Cackalacky
Re: eq 215ix
Nutxo,
I have an old EQ215 and it is installed before the AX406A in the signal chain, so the entire signal is affected by the EQ. I then have a LPL44 hooked up to the AX406A to adjust only the sub. This is the setup I think you were describing. I think it works really well.
Lowcountry Lion
I have an old EQ215 and it is installed before the AX406A in the signal chain, so the entire signal is affected by the EQ. I then have a LPL44 hooked up to the AX406A to adjust only the sub. This is the setup I think you were describing. I think it works really well.
Lowcountry Lion
Ride: 1999 Honda Civic Si (Blue; complete, unmodified B16A2)
Source A: Alpine CDA 9884
Source B: Alpine CHA S604 (Circa 1997)
Line Driver: PG PLD-1
Equalizer: PG EQ215
Crossover A: PG AX406A w/LPL44
Crossover B: PG AX204A
Amplifier A: PG M44
Amplifier B: PG M25 Series II
Front Stage: MB Quart QSD 216 6 1/2" Q-Series Comps (the real German deal; not Maxxsonics)
Subwoofer: Rockford Fosgate Punch 12
Install: http://phoenixphorum.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=19590
Source A: Alpine CDA 9884
Source B: Alpine CHA S604 (Circa 1997)
Line Driver: PG PLD-1
Equalizer: PG EQ215
Crossover A: PG AX406A w/LPL44
Crossover B: PG AX204A
Amplifier A: PG M44
Amplifier B: PG M25 Series II
Front Stage: MB Quart QSD 216 6 1/2" Q-Series Comps (the real German deal; not Maxxsonics)
Subwoofer: Rockford Fosgate Punch 12
Install: http://phoenixphorum.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=19590
Re: eq 215ix
that is the exact same thing the ix does.......
what else can I say I am a grumpy asshole most of the time.
Re: eq 215ix
Personally I recommend running the LPL to the amps rather than the EQ/XO. At the EQ, it lowers the output voltage of the RCA. At the amp, the RCA runs high voltage all the way to the amp, and the voltage is only cut internally. This way you get the best possible signal to noise ratio, especially when turned way down. You can still use an active crossover before the amp, you still have to set the amp as low pass, but with a very high crossover frequency (well above what your external XO is setting).
Re: eq 215ix
stipud wrote:Personally I recommend running the LPL to the amps rather than the EQ/XO. At the EQ, it lowers the output voltage of the RCA. At the amp, the RCA runs high voltage all the way to the amp, and the voltage is only cut internally. This way you get the best possible signal to noise ratio, especially when turned way down. You can still use an active crossover before the amp, you still have to set the amp as low pass, but with a very high crossover frequency (well above what your external XO is setting).
Mmats amps dotn have a bassknob. I guess I could just use a basscube .
Re: eq 215ix
In that case, definitely use the LPL on the EQ. Much better to cut signal than boost.nutxo wrote:stipud wrote:Personally I recommend running the LPL to the amps rather than the EQ/XO. At the EQ, it lowers the output voltage of the RCA. At the amp, the RCA runs high voltage all the way to the amp, and the voltage is only cut internally. This way you get the best possible signal to noise ratio, especially when turned way down. You can still use an active crossover before the amp, you still have to set the amp as low pass, but with a very high crossover frequency (well above what your external XO is setting).
Mmats amps dotn have a bassknob. I guess I could just use a basscube .