Impressed ...

Need help with your car stereo system? Have a technical question? Post here.
Post Reply
User avatar
ludeboost98
Posts: 117
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:53 pm
Location: Baltimore , MD

Impressed ...

Post by ludeboost98 »

So recently I installed my Focal components and was powering them off my zx950 . I was running active off my ms-8 with each speaker dedicated to it own channel .

I got bored ...

So , to tinker a bit I removed my tweeters and mids from the 450 side and the midbass' from the 500 side and reversed them . I decided to run passive for the mid/tweet from the 500 , and the midbass bridged stereo of the 450

Night and day difference ! Wow it's amazing what a little power can do . I was originally impressed with the sound off of the original config , but now the components really woke up . Yea I know it makes sense but I just figured I'd share .

My plan all along is to replace my zx950 with my ms1000ta and Mac 500 and go back to a fully active setup but for now this is new fun .
1x MS1000TA
1x MS2250 schrouded
1X MPS2500
1x MAC500 (MS2125 plate)
1x ZPA0.5 Black
1x ZX950 Black
1x Titanium 1200.1Ti
1x Titanium 600.2Ti
1x Titanuim 500.4Ti
1x EQ15x
User avatar
Lowcountrypsulion
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 3:38 am
Location: Charleston, South Cackalacky

Re: Impressed ...

Post by Lowcountrypsulion »

Hey Ludeboost98. I am in a similar situation with my M44, AX406A, and MB Quart QSD 216 Q-Series 6 1/2" comps.

I am currently using a dedicated channel of the M44 for each tweeter and mid. In other words, each front channel powers a tweeter and each rear channel powers a mid. I am also using the beautiful and beefy passives that came with the Quart set.

I experienced the same type of surprise when I wired it this way because in my previous installation I was using each front channel of the M44 to power both a mid and tweeter (through a passive) from an older, lesser set of 5 1/4" Quarts. As soon as gave each speaker its own channel (through the passive), it just sounded a whole lot better.

Now I am considering removing the passives in favor of the 3-way capability of the AX406A. I just don't which will do a better job, primarily because the passives that come with the QSD 216 set are so nice.
Ride: 1999 Honda Civic Si (Blue; complete, unmodified B16A2)
Source A: Alpine CDA 9884
Source B: Alpine CHA S604 (Circa 1997)
Line Driver: PG PLD-1
Equalizer: PG EQ215
Crossover A: PG AX406A w/LPL44
Crossover B: PG AX204A
Amplifier A: PG M44
Amplifier B: PG M25 Series II
Front Stage: MB Quart QSD 216 6 1/2" Q-Series Comps (the real German deal; not Maxxsonics)
Subwoofer: Rockford Fosgate Punch 12
Install: http://phoenixphorum.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=19590
ttocs
the Floor Sweeping Hack with Golden Ears
Posts: 14786
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:53 pm

Re: Impressed ...

Post by ttocs »

active is fun to play with but with good speakers they have been designed and tested to work optimumly with the x-over and why I would use it. I am using it on my Ti elite system I am running. Now I did bi-amp my hex 3ways which meant the woofers were on one channel and the tweeter/mid on the other and thought the extra power opened it up alot.
what else can I say I am a grumpy asshole most of the time.
Post Reply